William Matheson (nova_one) wrote,
William Matheson

I predict...

Penguins beat the Flyers (6)
Wings beat the Stars (5)
Wings beat the Penguins (4, maybe 5)


Edit, June 5th: The Penguins beat the Flyers in just five, the Wings and Stars took six, and the Wings and Penguins took six. But I was close! =)

Still, it was an "easy enough" pick - kind of like picking the Globetrotters over the Generals.

One thing I really appreciate about the Wings victory is that it doesn't seem so fluky like the Tampa, Carolina, and Anaheim victories (and none of those places are blue-chip solid hockey markets, either). And those victories were all over Canadian teams, which with the possible exception of Ottawa, also wound a fluky way to the Finals. If it had been Detroit beating Ottawa last year, it would have been easier to swallow - I mean, Anaheim?!

Anyway, Detroit was clearly the best this year, and they won - it may be a "routine" victory; yes, we've seen this before - yes, it's the fourth time in eleven years (that means the era of dynastic hockey is past us), but in that lies a sort of intrinsic appeal. You feel that all is right with the world. And it's an Original Six team, too.

I wonder who we'll get next year? Could there be a rematch?
Tags: hockey, nhl playoffs, predictions

  • (no subject)

    William: Back in Halifax tomorrow night! Stay tuned for updates! V. and Y. came to see us tonight. We were all really happy to reunite, if only for…

  • The Grande Prairie / Halifax / Poland Exchange

    Before I came to the cybercafé tonight, I was in one of those tired / blue moods that just sort of envelop you mentally and physically. It's like…

  • what do I want?

    I feel like I'm stuck in a bad movie about international intrigue that features lots of hotels and airports and tired traveling companions. We had a…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.